Last week, I wrote about how great of a tool the Cisco VNI is for mobile trend analysis and how it might not be best to use as THE ONLY definitive future forward-looking mobile trend predicter. The reason I really started looking at the Feb 2017 report, though, was because I wanted to see what it said about WiFi offload. I just went off on a tangent last week. This week, I return to the topic of WiFi offload.
My thesis has been that if WiFi offers lower costs for operators (who willingly support WiFi offload), then why do they not support this even more, as opposed to spending money on 5G? And what is 5G anyway? (Specs are not done yet.) If the service providers spend much more money on RAN infrastructure upgrades to 5G, then will this actually be better for their subscribers than spending likely less money on supporting WiFi offload? Their costs would go down and subscriber costs could also potentially go down.
Or better yet, if their pipe costs went down, they could spend more money on other value-added areas for their subscribers. Right now, just spending money on making better pipes will surely make them into the bit-pipe providers they say they don’t want to be.
According to the Cisco VNI, in 2016, 60% of mobile traffic was offloaded to WiFi, with expectations to grow to 63% by 2021. And also, according to the Cisco VNI, WiFi offload is higher on 4G networks (some have theorized it would be lower since 4G offers better speeds so people wouldn’t bother to offload) because of the data CAPS imposed by the service providers.
WiFi hotspots are also expected to grow 6x to 541 million by 2021. So it’s just a thought to think this through fully.
Is 5G really necessary right now? Is it a money pit? Might there be other options? And what as a service provider do you really want to be?
Publish Date: May 30, 2017 5:00 AM
Securing payments for on-premise or remote agents for telephone, IVR, web, mobile, Chat and Chatbot.
A patented technology that is flexible way to take secure, PCI DSS compliant payments via live agents over the telephone, web, Chat, Chatbot, or IVR. No sensitive data enters the contact centre environment so, agents do not see, hear, store or record any card or personal details.
CallGuard can be deployed in various ways to fit the way your contact centre works. The solution can de-scope all, or parts, of your contact centre from the scope of PCI DSS compliance and works just as well for on-premise or home/remote working agents.
ChatGuard makes payments in Chat PCI DSS compliant and...
PH: 01442 458300
|Scaling in the Cloud – Avoid Flying Too Close to the Sun||December 17, 2019 5:00 AM|
|SD-WAN’s Relationship with UCaaS||December 12, 2019 5:00 AM|
|Hearing and Seeing the Difference in UC Platforms||November 7, 2019 5:00 AM|
|Microservices Architecture – What is it, and why should I care?||October 31, 2019 5:00 AM|
|Panning for “Killer Apps” in the Gold Rush of 5G||February 14, 2019 5:00 AM|
|The Dialogic BUZZ UC Platform Swiss Army Knife||October 24, 2018 5:00 AM|
|DialogicONE - IoT Solutions||October 22, 2018 5:00 AM|
|Dialogic PowerMedia MRF – A Solution You Can Depend On||September 25, 2018 5:00 AM|
|Enabling WebRTC with the Dialogic PowerVille Load Balancer||July 16, 2018 5:00 AM|
|Telecom Meets Digital: The Importance of Establishing Controls||May 24, 2018 5:00 AM|