A client recently posed an interesting question to our team, asking, “Is it possible to quality monitor 100% of our telephone calls?” This is a great question. To answer it well, we first need to understand the time commitment of a contact center quality process, understand the reasons this is important, and then evaluate some of the available options currently on the market.
If you’re not familiar with quality assurance (QA), it’s a necessary process in all contact centers. It typically involves some sort of form where reviewers listen to calls and rate them based on a set of criteria. They then sit down with their agents to review the interactions and coach them on ways to improve.
The numbers likely vary from company to company, but for phone support a QA team might review anywhere from six to a dozen calls in a month per agent. Let’s do some quick math here to see the percentage of the total call volume the quality team is monitoring.
At six calls per month, you’re reviewing just 0.6% of the overall call volume. Now, let’s consider the time commitment required to handle this current QA workload.
Thirty minutes per QA monitor is a lot of time, and it’s important to note that depending on the complexity of your quality process, a reviewer may listen to a call more than once.
Another important consideration in the process is who’s doing the QA monitoring for the team and how much time it takes them. Larger operations might have dedicated quality teams whereas for others, the responsibility falls on supervisors to complete them in balance with their other tasks. Let’s look at what this time commitment involves.
I’ve made a lot of assumptions here but you can see that QA can eat up more than a quarter of supervisor time in the contact center and that’s to review a mere fraction of your overall call volume at 0.6%. At this rate, reviewing 100% of interactions would require a huge expenditure of both time and money. Is it even realistic?
It really isn’t outlandish for a client to ask us how they can review 100% of their calls. Here are a few very good reasons they’d want this:
At only a handful of reviewed calls per month, it’s only natural to worry that you might not get a clear picture of the performance of the contact center. It seems reasonable to think that the more interactions we review, the more we can coach our agents to be consistently at their very best. What if you had a way to ensure that the consistency was there on every customer interaction and catch negative patterns before they cause too much harm?
I’ve often told my customer service team members that they may very well be the only representative from our company that a customer ever speaks with. That means if their attitude is off or they give a wrong answer, the relationship with that customer might be forever damaged. The thought of not getting a second chance to make it right with a customer was downright terrifying for me as a manager.
Business leaders crave customer insights. They want to know what customers are saying, doing, and thinking. No one has more insight than the frontline customer service team that’s interacting with customers all day, every day. But how do we move from anecdotal feedback to feedback backed with data that illuminates what’s really going on in the customer experience?
Each of these reasons independent of the others makes it understandable why companies would want a solution to review 100% of their customer interactions. The ability to monitor quality, minimize churn, and gain valuable customer insight should be the goal for any organization, right?
Let’s take a look at some of the technologies on the market for QA. I see these fitting into three groups. Also, this is by no means a comprehensive view of the space but a survey of some of the popular ones I’ve encountered.
The first and most common tool we see for managing QA is what I would term a QA database. Systems like Scorebuddy and MaestroQA are popular, offering companies the following functionality:
Also, MaestroQA in particular has a terrific integration with Zendesk that allows you to pull tickets right into their system for review.
These systems run somewhere between $5-10 per agent per month, making them a fairly reasonable add on to your existing systems. While you won’t get that much closer to that 100% goal, consider that if you’re still using spreadsheets to track quality — and many companies do — a QA database can free up team to review more interactions and give valuable visibility into the performance of the team.
The next group of solutions are more in the category of workforce optimization systems. These systems offer a full suite of services including QA, scheduling, workforce management, and more. They include companies like Verint, Callminer, Virtual Observer, and NICE. Focusing on their QA offering specifically, here are some of the features they offer:
These solutions do much more than I’ve represented here but it’s clear that they offer more functionality that a simple QA database. They are also a much more significant expenditure. To get the most of it, you’ll want to make sure you have folks on your quality and customer experience teams with an analytical skillset.
The final set of solutions on the market are harnessing the power of AI and machine learning. Gridspace and Simple Emotion are a couple companies working to make reviewing 100% of calls a reality. The process to do so involves providing them with a quality form along with several thousand call recordings that have been monitored by your QA team. With enough data, their systems can learn to rate calls automatically, eventually without the assistance of humans, giving you complete visibility into the quality of your team.
The systems have already found success in more scripted contact center environments. The real opportunity here for the future is for them to pair a quality database with machine learning so calls are fed into the system and quality teams can train the machines to review the calls. These tools are really at the forefront of what I think is going to be a big key to the future of QA in the contact center.
As you consider these various technologies and next steps, here are a handful of recommendations that I think are relevant regardless of the size of your organization or budget.
To answer the question our client posed at the beginning of this article, yes, it’s totally possible to review 100% of the calls in your contact center. With the assistance of some incredibly exciting technology, this goal becomes more and more of a reality. With the right culture and creativity, however, this might not be as urgent as you might think. Wherever you’re at in this process, don’t forget to stay focused on why you have a quality process. It’s all about continuously improving your customer experience.
Publish Date: May 26, 2017 5:00 AM
|1.)||Call Center Studio|
Call Center Studio
Call Center Studio is the world’s first call center built on Google and is one of the most secure and stable systems with some of the industry’s best reporting. It is one of the most full-featured enterprise grade systems (with the most calling features, one of the best call distribution, outbound dialing features and integrations—including IVR, AI Speech Recognition, blended inbound/outbound calling and includes Google’s new Dialogflow and Speech API. Call Center Studio is the absolute easiest to use (with a 10 minute setup), and is the price performance leader with lower equipment cost and less setup time.
PH: +1 512-872-7565
|2.)||Computer Data Services, LLC|
Get the benefits of an expensive, on-premise telephone system without the high price tag and annoying maintenance.
- Never miss another phone call
- No more busy signals
- Feature rich
- Answer your calls from anywhere
Megacall provides a fully customised Virtual Switchboard software for all companies (including IVR service). No matter the size of your business, our services adapt to the needs of each client.
Are you looking for a more effective way to communicate with your customers? Discover the advantages of using the IVR and how it can help in your communications.
PH: +34 952 667 511
MightyCall's IVR that will increase your business’s efficiency at a fraction of the cost of a secretary. Your auto-attendant is designed to:
- Greet callers
- Deliver necessary information
- Forward calls to the appropriate extension
- Take human error out of the system
PH: +1 (888) 256-8312
The SPEED solution solves for service level issues while cost optimizing the environment with automation.
Provides an enhanced way to speed up & optimize invoking temporary agent skills configuration changes into the contact center environment.
Speed allows you to schedule both future changes & temporary changes that auto-revert back to the original state when scheduled time expires.
*Automated / Scheduled Temporary Agent Skills Configuration Management
*Immediate Temporary or Reoccurring Schedule Skills Configuration Changes
*Easy to Use/Operations Administration Focused
*Descriptive Monitoring Activity Dashboard
*Detailed “End to End’ Audit Trail and Performance Monitoring
|When Friendly Customer Service is Secondary||February 20, 2019 5:00 AM|
|Customer Service Edge Cases. To Empower or Not to Empower?||January 18, 2019 5:00 AM|
|FCR Solutions Spotlight: 5 Contact Center Tech Upgrades to Consider in 2019||January 11, 2019 5:00 AM|
|How Chat Analytics Differs from Voice Analytics||January 3, 2019 5:00 AM|
|Sad and Happy Goodbyes||December 21, 2018 5:00 AM|
|Creating A Customer Service Quality Assurance Form Doesn’t Have To Be Scary (Here’s How)||December 14, 2018 5:00 AM|
|A Miscellaneous Lot of Thoughts on Quality Scoring||December 10, 2018 5:00 AM|
|7 Essentials for a Customer Service Voice and Style Guide||November 29, 2018 5:00 AM|
|The Customer Service Advice We’re Thankful For||November 21, 2018 5:00 AM|
|Customer Experience Insights From the Innovators||November 15, 2018 5:00 AM|