Cookie Preference Centre

Your Privacy
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Performance Cookies
Functional Cookies
Targeting Cookies

Your Privacy

When you visit any web site, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences, your device or used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually identify you directly, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. You can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, you should know that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site may not work then.

Cookies used

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies, we will not know when you have visited our site.

Cookies used

Google Analytics

Functional Cookies

These cookies allow the provision of enhance functionality and personalization, such as videos and live chats. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies, then some or all of these functionalities may not function properly.

Cookies used




Targeting Cookies

These cookies are set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant ads on other sites. They work by uniquely identifying your browser and device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will not experience our targeted advertising across different websites.

Cookies used


This site uses cookies and other tracking technologies to assist with navigation and your ability to provide feedback, analyse your use of our products and services, assist with our promotional and marketing efforts, and provide content from third parties


Here are some suggested Connections for you! - Log in to start networking.

4 Myths About Chat Support. AI to the Rescue? - FCR - Blog

4 Myths About Chat Support. AI to the Rescue?

This article was originally published on CustomerThink on February 13, 2018. Click here to read the original.

A big reason chat has taken hold in the market (setting aside customer preference) is that it promises reduced cost per contact because agents can handle multiple chats concurrently. For the purpose of this article, when I say “chat” I’m referring to all live messaging channels including Facebook Messenger and SMS.

Speaking of cost per contact, I didn’t even know what it was until I read Call Centers for Dummies as a new support leader. I quickly learned that cost per contact can be difficult to calculate (typically total cost of support divided by total contacts handled) and even trickier to break down by individual support channel. That doesn’t stop companies from touting chat as a less expensive channel than phone and email.

Rather than venturing to break down my own cost per contact for each support channel, I’ve used a guideline from Contact Centre Helper that estimates chat support is 17-30% less expensive than other channels.

In all practicality, however, there are some myths I’ve seen in play in contact centers that we need to address if we’re going to take full advantage of the savings. And on the other side, to avoid the risk of spending significantly more on chat.

Myth #1: Agents can handle other channels while doing chats

When I first added chat to our suite of support channels more than a decade ago, volume was low and I asked my agents to handle chats “in between” phone calls, which inevitably meant “during” as well. After all, we were doing emails in between calls with good success. That practice promptly ended when I tried taking chats and calls at the same time. The result was two mixed up conversations, and a terrible experience for both customers, not to mention a serious security risk!

From the standpoint of support leaders and workforce managers, chat can be tricky to plan for. It’s only normal to want to add it to the plate of your existing team without making significant workforce changes. The reality is that you’re going to have to dedicate staff to the channel accordingly and plan on them not answering phone calls.

Recommendation: Don’t ask agents to handle more than one live channel at a time. This means you shouldn’t blend phone and chat but you can blend chat and email or phone and email assuming there are some gaps between chats and calls.

Myth #2: Chats are more efficient than phone calls

I can remember getting engaged with a support team a while back and quickly learning that they had decided to only handle one chat at a time. When I was running a support team, we found that while our average handle time for phone calls was typically 8-10 minutes, our handle time for chats was more like 10-15 minutes. That means a single chat takes longer and therefore is more expensive than a phone call. If you plan on taking one chat at a time, you’re better off dropping the channel altogether if the handle time is significantly longer than phone.

The real efficiency of chat is found in handling multiple chats concurrently and that assumes there are significant gaps in conversations with customers. Granted, there will be times where agents are in a really involved chat or perhaps they need to call the customer for easier troubleshooting. In the spirit of great customer service, it’s important to give your agents the latitude to move the conversation to a better (more efficient) channel at their discretion.

Recommendation: Plan on your chat agents handling more than one chat at a time to maximize savings.

Myth #3: Agents can handle many chats at once

While this one is technically true, there’s a balance that needs to be struck. As I’ve already said, too few chats and it’s probably not a viable channel. Too many chats, however, and things start to come apart at the seams. I surveyed our programs at FCR and found that most teams are handling between two and three chats at a time with very few going beyond that. Many of our teams at FCR do start brand new agents on one chat and then ramp them up to more over the course of a week or two as they become proficient.

It’s important to understand the complexity of the chats for your own company before determining how many your agents can handle. For example, the more windows agents are required to have open for these conversations, the more likely there are to be mix ups in conversations. Also, the more conversations agents have going on at once, the more likelihood of long delays between messages for certain customers.

Recommendation: Agents should be handling multiple chats concurrently but it’s important to strike a balance. As you’re reading through chat conversations, if you see customers saying “Hello! Is anyone there?” or something similar, your agents might be handling too many conversations at once.

Myth #4: Any great customer service agent can do chat

When I began staffing for chat, I initially rotated quite a few of my team members onto the channel because they loved the change of pace from phone calls. What I learned was that there was a much wider variance in average handle time on chat in comparison to phone. I had some agents averaging eight minutes and others averaging twenty.

I decided to have all of my agents take a typing test and sure enough, my more efficient agents typed ninety or more words per minute and our least efficient were below sixty. From that point, we changed our hiring profile, had candidates take a typing test, and filtered out anyone who couldn’t type more than sixty words per minute. Out of our existing team members, the faster typists spent more time doing chat and the others handled phone support instead.

Recommendation: Not everyone can easily do chat. Hire great customer service professionals who can type fast to maximize efficiency.

How AI Can Help

Chatbots and macros are among the more popular ways to make chat more efficient but I have a couple thoughts here. First, chatbots still seem to be a good thought but for any company that’s not a large enterprise, it might be a challenge to find issues with enough volume to justify building a bot. Many tools exist to present self-help options to customers before they submit a chat and that’s where I’d start.

Second, macros (aka canned responses) are great for efficiency but customers can still smell “canned” a mile away, especially when they aren’t tailored to the customer’s specific situation before sending. One possibility I’ve seen recently with companies like Digital Genius and TrueAI offers better macro suggestion for chat. Rather than giving THE right answer to agents, they suggest a handful of responses that have worked for that scenario in the past and resulted in high customer satisfaction.

With this model, humans work alongside the AI with humans only answering the questions that the AI is unable to. This promises significant reduction in the time to train new agents and increased consistency and accuracy of responses while not losing the human element.


On a recent call with a vendor, my cost per contact brain asked if AI macro suggestion would enable agents to handle more chats concurrently. He was quick to correct me, stating that it actually enables agents to handle chats at a faster pace without ratcheting up how many they need to work on at once. Any increase in productivity without ratcheting up the stress is a win-win.

Whether you’re ready to adopt an AI solution or not, chat support offers significant savings for your support operation right now if you do it right. If you’re hiring customers service pros who can work at the right pace, dedicating people to the channel, and finding a balance for how many conversations agents handle at once (more than one), you’re well on your way to reaping those benefits.


Publish Date: March 23, 2018 5:00 AM

2021 Buyers Guide Business Continuity


CallGuard Remote
A flexible way to take secure, PCI DSS compliant payments from home or remote locations. It’s quick to deploy needs no changes to processes or systems.

CallGuard Remote prevents agents from seeing, hearing or recording card details so, the agent, their screen, and any call recordings are removed from the scope of PCI DSS.

This simple approach means the customer effectively types their own payment information into the agent’s payment screen, but with the card details being shielded from the agent’s view. It’s simple, and highly effective.

OpsTel Services

The SPEED solution solves for service level issues while cost optimizing the environment with automation.

Provides an enhanced way to speed up & optimize invoking temporary agent skills configuration changes into the contact center environment.

Speed allows you to schedule both future changes & temporary changes that auto-revert back to the original state when scheduled time expires.

Speed features:

*Automated / Scheduled Temporary Agent Skills Configuration Management
*Immediate Temporary or Reoccurring Schedule Skills Configuration Changes
*Easy to Use/Operations Administration Focused
*Descriptive Monitoring Activity Dashboard
*Detailed “End to End’ Audit Trail and Perfor...
(read more)


VADS Business Continuity Plan
VADS provides a business continuity plan by providing full outsource services and manage services. we've provided this to several clients. You can contact us for a detailed study case.

Teckinfo Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

InterDialog UCCS
Adapting to the new normal contact center industry has to be ready for work from anywhere agents to maintain business continuity. Even when working from remote locations, the work from home agents or remote agents need to be monitored for smooth customer service operations or effective tele sales.

InterDialog UCCS with its work from home agent ready call center software helps you to have complete control over your contact center operations. Agents can log in from any where , home, office or any other place where they are through their mobile phone or desktop , or even through our ID mobile app . With centralized recording & reporting , you gain visibility of all contact center metrics , and you can manage your center the same way as you were doing when working from office.

View more from FCR

Recent Blog Posts:
When Friendly Customer Service is SecondaryFebruary 20, 2019 5:00 AM
Customer Service Edge Cases. To Empower or Not to Empower?January 18, 2019 5:00 AM
FCR Solutions Spotlight: 5 Contact Center Tech Upgrades to Consider in 2019January 11, 2019 5:00 AM
How Chat Analytics Differs from Voice AnalyticsJanuary 3, 2019 5:00 AM
Sad and Happy GoodbyesDecember 21, 2018 5:00 AM
Creating A Customer Service Quality Assurance Form Doesn’t Have To Be Scary (Here’s How)December 14, 2018 5:00 AM
A Miscellaneous Lot of Thoughts on Quality ScoringDecember 10, 2018 5:00 AM
7 Essentials for a Customer Service Voice and Style GuideNovember 29, 2018 5:00 AM
The Customer Service Advice We’re Thankful ForNovember 21, 2018 5:00 AM
Customer Experience Insights From the InnovatorsNovember 15, 2018 5:00 AM

About us - in 60 seconds!

Latest Americas Newsletter
both ids empty
session userid =
session UserTempID =
session adminlevel =
session blnTempHelpChatShow =
session cookie set = True
session page-view-total =
session page-view-total =
applicaiton blnAwardsClosed =
session blnCompletedAwardInterestPopup =
session blnCheckNewsletterInterestPopup =
session blnCompletedNewsletterInterestPopup =