Call Recorder or Recording Engine? Which do you Need?

It's like the chicken and the egg - which came first: the call recorder or the recording engine? Honestly, it doesn't matter because they are not necessarily inextricably linked, as they serve to very different use cases.

A call recorder is a piece of software (or hardware and software) that captures customer calls and stores them for later replay. Most recorders have a dynamic user interface to enable multi-criteria searching to quickly locate the calls you need most for compliance, dispute resolution, quality assurance, etc.

A recording engine is quite different, although you may not initially think so. Yes, a call recorder has a recording engine within it, but we aren't looking at it that way right now. For this post, we are viewing a recording engine as a distinct piece of software that captures recorded calls and sends them directly to a transcription engine, which then sends the transcribed text on to a speech analytics engine - all of which can take place in fractions of milliseconds. These solutions power real-time analytics which can identify at-risk customers before they leave, uncover compliance infractions while the agent is still on the phone, enable automated QA and so on. 

You see, one (a recorder) serves as a capture/playback device to store and replay the interactions themselves for various business purposes. The other (a recording engine) serves as a capture/streaming device, which feeds speech analytics for keyword/phrase spotting. This enables automated QA and other real-time functions (such as identifying at-risk customers or agent compliance infractions) that can drive real intraday advantages and risk mitigation.   

An important component to consider here is real-time vs. post-call in terms of how calls are handled and utilized. Real-time audio capture arms your business with some advanced capabilities that provide significant and immediate business value (e.g. rescuing customers considering defection, interceding a failing sales call to save the sale, and many more). Post-call audio capture also provides substantial value but in a less immediate manner (e.g. agent-supervisor call review, evidence for dispute resolution, and countless others).  

Questions to Ask

The question now is, which one do you need/want for your organization? The long answer is...Most large organizations have both to serve the two unique use cases. Some smaller organizations, on the other hand, choose to forego the primary call recorder altogether as they rely on the scaled-down recording functionality embedded within their telephony system. If they are satisfied with its capabilities, they may opt for a recording engine alone to power their speech analytics. 

The short answer is...You should have both. That is the best way to satisfy both use cases. 

Here are some questions to ask yourself to help you determine which is the best route for your organization:

1. How do you plan/want to leverage your customer calls?

• Real time, automated QA - recording engine
• Real time customer rescue - recording engine
• Real time compliance assurance - recording engine
• Real time order verification - recording engine
• Post-call QA - recorder
• Post-call customer win-back - recorder
• Post-call compliance verification/proof - recorder
• Post-call dispute resolution - recorder
• Post-call order verification - recorder

2. How concerned are you about intraday performance improvements?

• Very concerned - recording engine
• Not overly concerned - recorder

3. Do you plan to store your recorded customer interactions?

• Yes - recorder
• No - recording engine

Take a few minutes to think through these questions and determine where your organization stands (or wants to stand) in terms of recorder vs. recording engine use cases. Your compliance, performance and risk management efforts may depend upon it. 

Source: https://blog.orecx.com/blog/call-recorder-or-recording-engine-which-do-you-need

2023 Buyers Guide

Get Listed

Call Routing Optimization

 

1.)	Eastwind Communications Eastwind sells Oracle, Ribbon, and Dialogic SBC and routing solutions for both premise-based and cloud-based deployments along with Microsoft Teams integration. Eastwind offers managed service offerings and complete 7x24 support.

2.)

Lieber & Associates Call Routing and Contact Center Optimization L&A provides consulting services to optimize contact centers, including call routing, skills-based routing, and multi-location routing. The firm's senior consultants have several decades of experience each in this area and work with all vendors' systems. L&A's president pioneered skills-based routing.

3.)

OpsTel Services SPEED The SPEED solution solves for service level issues while cost optimizing the environment with automation. Provides an enhanced way to speed up & optimize invoking temporary agent skills configuration changes into the contact center environment. Speed allows you to schedule both future changes & temporary changes that auto-revert back to the original state when scheduled time expires. Speed features: *Automated / Scheduled Temporary Agent Skills Configuration Management *Immediate Temporary or Reoccurring Schedule Skills Configuration Changes *Easy to Use/Operations Administration Focused *Descriptive Monitoring Activity Dashboard *Detailed “End to End’ Audit Trail and Performance Monitoring

 

View more from OrecX

Recent Blog Posts:

Does your Call Recorder Prime or Prevent Analytics?	March 23, 2023
Call Recording Compliance with Dodd-Frank, PCI, MiFID II, HIPAA, and CMS	January 27, 2023
8 Questions to Ask a Prospective Recording Vendor	December 9, 2022
Call Recorder or Recording Engine? Which do you Need?	March 14, 2022
Call Recording Insights from Steve Kaiser	January 3, 2022
Recording VoIP Traffic via Port Mirroring Switch	October 27, 2021
10 Advantages of Cloud Recording	September 28, 2021
VICIdial Open Source Call Recording	August 24, 2021
Call Recording for Comcast Business VoiceEdge	August 17, 2021
Can your Call Recorder do This?	July 29, 2021