Cookie Preference Centre

Your Privacy
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Performance Cookies
Functional Cookies
Targeting Cookies

Your Privacy

When you visit any web site, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences, your device or used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually identify you directly, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. You can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, you should know that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site may not work then.

Cookies used

ContactCenterWorld.com

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies, we will not know when you have visited our site.

Cookies used

Google Analytics

Functional Cookies

These cookies allow the provision of enhance functionality and personalization, such as videos and live chats. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies, then some or all of these functionalities may not function properly.

Cookies used

Twitter

Facebook

LinkedIn

Targeting Cookies

These cookies are set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant ads on other sites. They work by uniquely identifying your browser and device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will not experience our targeted advertising across different websites.

Cookies used

LinkedIn

This site uses cookies and other tracking technologies to assist with navigation and your ability to provide feedback, analyse your use of our products and services, assist with our promotional and marketing efforts, and provide content from third parties

OK
[HIDE]

Here are some suggested Connections for you! - Log in to start networking.

EXECUTIVE MEMBER
Ikhwal Sidiq
Assistant Manager Trade and Remittance Services
408
MEMBER
Andres Barrios
Cloud Campus Regional Director
2
MEMBER
Thamer Noori
Director of Industrial Security and Safety Dept.
13
MEMBER
David Chacon
Global Growth & New Operating Models Director
50
MEMBER
Jason Taylor
Officer of County 311 Services
0

Article : Driving Down The Total Cost Of Ownership In CRM Systems

These days, organisations are taking a close look at the projected return on their IT investments. Unfortunately, most customer relationship management (CRM) systems are extremely expensive, leading their supporters to project unrealistic returns that will never be met, particularly during a downturn.

This is a set up for disappointment and "failure", and the higher the investment, the more likely the disappointment. The good news is that CRM systems can, in fact, deliver a healthy ROI in a reasonable amount of time, no matter what the economy. In order to reap such a benefit, however, organisations must choose their CRM systems with the utmost care, setting clear objectives for what they want to achieve through CRM and finding a vendor that can be flexible to business requirements.


According to Dale Hagemeyer of Gartner Inc., "Total cost of ownership (TCO) is key! Through 2005 as more small-to-mid-sized companies (750 mobile reps and less) look to automate their business processes through CRM, they should seriously evaluate vendors who have good out-of-the-box functionality, a highly flexible solution, and can implement rapidly. Executing through integration partners will become an issue for the small-to-mid-sized companies because the significant integration cost has to scale down relative to the number of licenses. Smaller projects must translate to smaller integration costs and a la carte software pricing to keep the TCO acceptable. Winners will be those who can keep the costs in scale."

The total cost of ownership of a CRM solution includes licenses, implementation costs, support costs and most importantly, the costs of changing the system on a regular basis to meet changing business conditions. In each of these areas, it is a system's underlying technology – the foundation on which everything else is built – that is the most significant factor in containing the total cost of ownership.

 

Reducing Implementation Costs
One often hears, with regard to CRM systems, "The technology doesn't really matter. They all do the same thing." This is a mistaken belief. Every system can capture some contact details and record a call. But some do it much more quickly and inexpensively than others. Systems that come in with a better design up front save the customer the costs of redesigning it over and over again. Yet, because the "all CRM technology is the same" myth is so prevalent, many organisations follow one of three paths that ultimately lead to massive unforeseen complications and, consequently, to potentially ruinous hidden costs.

The first common pitfall is to say, "Let's implement a system right off the shelf, and if we have to, we can fix it later." This is actually the most costly way to go about things. Everyone who interacts with such a system will want to make changes to it, and if the system does not have the strong foundation of a very flexible software architecture, changes will be time consuming and costly. Of course, every off-the-shelf solution touts itself as "flexible", but many are not. Organisations that choose inflexible solutions will be faced with the prospect of scrapping them and starting over or changing their business processes to try to fit the software, in the process losing any possibility of the competitive advantages that flexible CRM architectures can offer.

The second common pitfall is that customers are attracted to software that has the most perceived functionality – on the premise that if one blankets the entire area, one will cover the function points that are actually needed. Bloatware (or shelfware as many CRM vendors call it because the majority of the functions or modules never get taken off the shelf) makes software more complex, more difficult to use and train, and in the end, more expensive because the additional, un-needed bells and whistles must all be maintained and modified during the product's life. If you buy a tractor-trailer, instead of a pickup truck, expect to pay more for petrol.

The third common pitfall is buying into "best practices" CRM software touted by vendors and consultants. "Best practices" is really a vendor's way of selling inflexible software and making an organisation change its business processes to match the ones already defined in the software, rather than the more difficult (from the vendor's point of view) path of creating a solid architecture that can be fit exactly to the organisation's business. Lets face it: software companies haven't worked out how the software industry works. Why should anyone think they could tell a company how to run its business?

The better approach is to collaborate with a vendor that has the most flexible architecture, paired with solid foundation functionality that can get customers started on the process of designing a CRM solution specific to their business. No one should be fooled by "user defined fields" or "switches" to turn functionality on and off – these are superficial changes that will not alter the way the software works. It's necessary to ensure that the data model can be defined from the ground up, if necessary. Better still, ensure that the architecture supports an Object Oriented Data Model (OODM) design tool, which is inherently more flexible than traditional design methods. Buyers should make certain that the business processes and logic can be changed, and that the interface is not only flexible, but can also be personalized by individual users. By employing these standards to judge CRM software, purchasers will end up with a product that will fit their business better – and therefore, will be more cost effective to implement and support. Such a product has a real chance of making a positive effect on one's business.

When this approach is taken, a CRM system can be implemented at a ratio of one dollar in licenses to one to two dollars in implementation costs. That is an astonishing advantage, given that typical large vendors take one dollar in licenses to up to four to ten dollars in implementation fees.

 

Containing Training and Support Costs
Some additional benefits: Having a truly flexible, customised architecture in place leads to lower training costs and lower support costs. Training will be simpler and consume less "lost time" because the system will be based on an organisation's already familiar in-place business processes (forget trying to train bloatware, you will spend much time telling people to ignore this feature or that field and you will have difficulty getting to what really matters).

As for support issues, organisations with up-to-speed users will save themselves large amounts on the hidden or unforeseen costs of such features as Help Desk, not to mention the communications costs of connecting with that Help Desk. Now the total cost of ownership is reduced even further.

Money will also be saved on the cost of data-cleansing activities – yet another hidden cost of CRM systems. The more users intuitively understand the workings of the system, the less garbage goes in – and the less garbage comes out.

Finally, support costs will be driven down substantially by choosing a vendor whose software has underlying architecture which allows it to control, monitor and maintain systems in the field without taking them out of production for repair. Central synchronisation of core technology can enable a vendor to do anything it needs to on a software basis remotely, without touching the machine. Organisations should look for a vendor who internally develops all the building blocks of its core technology – the application itself, Command Center, Analytics, Call Center and the various add-ons that go with it. That will allow more control over the product, rather than being at the mercy of a second tier vendor, which translates into savings, both on a straight dollar level and on a productivity level.

 

A House Built on Rock
The total cost of ownership of CRM systems is often greater than projected and, therefore, great expectations for ROI can be dashed. Selecting software that is based on a strong, solid, truly flexible and customisable core technology architecture mitigates this situation.

ROI can only be gained from a CRM solution that is actually used by the people that it is meant to help. A great person once said that no great salesperson was ever fired because they did not use a computer system. If you sell, you're hired. The road to user adoption is to create a solution that provides real value. The only way to achieve this is to use technology that is flexible enough to be molded around existing business processes and culture. Don't try to use a computer system to change the culture of the organisation – a system can support and reinforce a cultural change – but it can't make one.

The truth is that no house will stand if built upon sand. Build your house upon rock, and all things are possible.


About the Author
As Vice President of Business Development, Sam has a cross-functional role encompassing the creation of new business, including building relationships with StayinFront's global accounts and establishing new partnerships that extend the services StayinFront offers to its clients. Sam has eight years of experience implementing and managing complex CRM systems.

About the Company
StayinFront is a global provider of enterprise-wide customer relationship management (CRM) applications, decision support tools and eBusiness systems. StayinFront combines unique technologies with an extensive implementation and support infrastructure to ensure a successful CRM project.

Today's Tip of the Day - Keep Cost In Perspective

Read today's tip or listen to it on podcast.

Published: Monday, June 2, 2003

Printer Friendly Version Printer friendly version

About us - in 60 seconds!

Join Our Team

Industry Champion Award Leaderboard

Most active award (top 10) entrants in the past 48 hours! - Vote for Others / About Program
Submit Event

Upcoming Events

The 19th AMERICAS Annual Best Practices Conferences are here! Meeting Point for the World's Best Contact Center & CX Companies Read More...
 31813 
Showing 1 - 1 of 3 items

Newsletter Registration

Please check to agree to be placed on the eNewsletter mailing list.
both ids empty
session userid =
session UserTempID =
session adminlevel =
session blnTempHelpChatShow =
CMS =
session cookie set = True
session page-view-total = 1
session page-view-total = 1
applicaiton blnAwardsClosed =
session blnCompletedAwardInterestPopup =
session blnCheckNewsletterInterestPopup =
session blnCompletedNewsletterInterestPopup =