NEXTGEN-TV PROGRAMMING
NOW PLAYING
Starting on the hour every hour today
Coming up this Week
When you consider investing in an employment testing system to help make hiring and advancement decisions, it's important to recognize that not all tests are created equal. Here's what you need to know to make the best choice. The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing describe many types of information that testing companies should be able to provide to test users. Although The Standards do describe employers' best practices, it should be stressed that they are not laws. In specific situations, legal and practical considerations will take precedence. A testing company should provide test users or potential test users sufficient information so that, before they adopt a test, they can evaluate the suitability of the test. In particular, the test user should be able to learn the following: | |
The testing company should explain the proper interpretation of test scores. This is especially important if, instead of being reported in raw form (for example, number of correct answers), the scores are converted to a special scale (examples: percentiles, stanines, a scale of 0 to 10, or a scale of minus 3 to plus 3). If the test includes overall or composite scores that combine the results from several subscales, the testing company should explain how these composite scores are calculated, and how they should be interpreted. For example, do all subscales receive equal weight? If particular misinterpretations of the scores are likely, test users should be forewarned. If the testing company scores the tests and the scoring system automatically assigns labels, categories, or descriptions to test takers, such as "unqualified" or "advanced programmer," the testing company should be able to provide a rationale for these assignments.
Support for Claims If the testing company claims that test scores can predict job performance (that is, that there is a correlation between test scores and a job performance measure), they should also report the basis for that claim, including supporting evidence. The evidence should be detailed enough that the test user can judge whether the same results were likely to be obtained in the test user's own setting with the test user's own candidates and/or employees, and using the test user's own preferred performance measures.
Accuracy of Measurement The SEM gives the likely margin of error in an individual's test score, in terms of the scale in which the score is reported. The SEM makes it possible to define a "confidence zone" around an individual's score on a test. However, the SEMs of different tests usually cannot be compared because SEM is influenced by factors such as test length. What Test Users Should Do To Ensure the Validity of Their Tests Test users should note that, by increasing the validity of their testing program, they are simultaneously increasing its effectiveness and its legal defensibility. Further, the test users are legally responsible for the validity of their own testing process. Before adopting a test, a test user should be comfortable that the test is appropriate for its intended use. In particular, the test should:
If the population of test takers contains a large number of individuals who are members of protected classes (for example, minorities, women, and people with disabilities), the test user should investigate whether the test would be suitable for those individuals. Beware of test score misinterpretations. There are many ways that a test score can be misinterpreted, but they can all be avoided if the test user knows enough about how the test is constructed and what the scores mean. One common source of misinterpretation is scale names that are ambiguous or misleading. For example, if a candidate scores high on a scale titled "Assertiveness," does that mean she takes initiative, or does it mean she is argumentative? Does it mean she takes the lead in social situations, or does it mean she defends her ideas energetically? If the test user has investigated the intent and the content of the Assertiveness scale, he or she will be able to interpret this score more accurately. Depending on the subject matter, tests may become out of date as jobs and technology change. The test may no longer be applicable to how the job is performed, or it may contain references that reveal its age (for example, math problems involving 10-cent cups of coffee). In the first case, the test is no longer job-relevant; in the second case the test may remain relevant but the obsolete references may be distracting to test takers. The test user is responsible for using only tests that are job relevant and up to date. About the Author About the Company |
Published: Thursday, May 22, 2003
NEXTGEN-TV PROGRAMMING
NOW PLAYING
Starting on the hour every hour today
Coming up this Week
Nathalya Wani Sabu Executive Vice President PT. Bank Central Asia, Tbk |
Bharat Parshotam Head Direct Delivery Absa |
Nuryanto - Head of CSM Operation Bukalapak |
Sindhu Porwal Deputy Vice President ICICI lombard |
Emmanuel Omoike Team leader QPhoto Pty |
Aymen Ismail Head of Customer Engagement Solutions smart Europe GmbH |
Danny Singer Founder& Chief Product Officer Noetica |
Ben Oxford Head of Digital Crisis Support Services Lifeline WA |
Pooja Raiyani Vice President ICICI Lombard GIC Ltd |
Zulkifly - Internal Auditor BPDPKS-Directorate General of Treasury |
I am checking out all the amazing and daily updated content on ContactCenterWorld.com and networking with professionals worldwide
Send To Friends Post On My Wall