Cookie Preference Centre

Your Privacy
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Performance Cookies
Functional Cookies
Targeting Cookies

Your Privacy

When you visit any web site, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences, your device or used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually identify you directly, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. You can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, you should know that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site may not work then.

Cookies used

ContactCenterWorld.com

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies, we will not know when you have visited our site.

Cookies used

Google Analytics

Functional Cookies

These cookies allow the provision of enhance functionality and personalization, such as videos and live chats. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies, then some or all of these functionalities may not function properly.

Cookies used

Twitter

Facebook

LinkedIn

Targeting Cookies

These cookies are set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant ads on other sites. They work by uniquely identifying your browser and device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will not experience our targeted advertising across different websites.

Cookies used

LinkedIn

This site uses cookies and other tracking technologies to assist with navigation and your ability to provide feedback, analyse your use of our products and services, assist with our promotional and marketing efforts, and provide content from third parties

OK
[HIDE]

Here are some suggested Connections for you! - Log in to start networking.

EXECUTIVE MEMBER
Ikhwal Sidiq
Assistant Manager Trade and Remittance Services
408
MEMBER
Richard Roberts
Adviser and Consultant
18
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
Selin İcer
Quality - Training & Academy Director
29
MEMBER
Thamer Noori
Director of Industrial Security and Safety Dept.
13

Article : New IVR/CTI Monitoring Technologies Help Improve Performance

Most contact center managers feel unrelenting pressure to reduce per-call costs without undermining customer satisfaction. To achieve these goals, contact centers are using the constantly-evolving sophistication of IVR and CTI technology to deliver ever-higher levels of customer self-service and agent efficiency. The economics of using these tools are compelling: a self-service IVR transaction averages about 45 cents, while the cost of an agent-assisted transaction frequently exceeds five dollars per call in combined personnel and toll costs.

At the same time, however, customers expect—even demand—that contact centers deliver consistently high levels of quality, reliability and availability. If the customer's Quality of Experience (QoE) falls short in any way (dropped calls, incorrect prompts, poor routing, prolonged silence or delay), there are only two outcomes: either the customer "zeroes out" to an agent queue, or the customer gives up and goes away—sometimes permanently. Either outcome kills the advantages of self-service applications, and erodes both a company's image and its bottom line.


Kurt Dahlstrand
Application Management Consultant
Empirix Inc.


Fortunately, a new generation of end-to-end monitoring technologies can help identify and diagnose performance problems before they affect customer QoE, so that contact centers can gain the full benefit of self-service voice applications without incurring any of the hidden costs. By automatically dialing in and navigating through a voice transaction the same way a customer would, these technologies can track and measure the entire range of potential quality and performance problems – from the public switched telephone network to the back-end databases and out to the agent

 

The High Cost of Ignorance
Among the worst (and most avoidable) costs imposed by subtle, undetected performance errors are the added call lengths, toll charges and personnel costs that arise when call traffic that should have been handled by a self-service application are passed off to an agent.

Even a modest period of unnecessary congestion can generate significant added costs. At the contact center for a major U.S. bank, for example, managers discovered that a single 20-minute period of congestion in its IVR system (which normally handles about 75 percent of all customer queries) led to four hours of agent overload. Unable to complete their self-service transactions, customers zeroed out to agents – increasing the number of agent assisted calls by 300 percent. This burden on customer service agents not only raised the agent costs associated with these calls, but also boosted queue times and toll charges as frustrated customers waited to get through to an agent instead of using the self-service menus. The bank in question ran an analysis of these direct costs and determined that this recurring IVR performance problem imposed direct costs of over $2 million a year.

Indirect costs due to poor performance are harder to measure, but this data suggests that the dollar value of customers and business lost due to poor IVR/CTI application performance can be even higher than the direct operating costs.

To get a handle on these costs, and to keep customers satisfied with the increasing use of self-service applications, savvy contact center managers are beginning to embrace new monitoring tools and services that measure voice application performance. These automated solutions record carrier, host and database response times while verifying that the right prompt is playing at a sufficient quality level and that the call has been routed to the appropriate agent along with all the appropriate call data necessary to create a screen pop. If a problem is detected, these tools immediately issue an alert to the appropriate technical resource. The alert identifies both the type of problem and its location, and allows technical personnel to take corrective action before the problem begins to adversely affect customers, tie up technical resources and escalate into an expensive degradation of agent productivity and overall contact center efficiency.

 

"This Call May Be Monitored . . ."
Despite the many advantages of automated end-to-end monitoring from the customer's perspective, these enhanced monitoring technologies are only now beginning to become an industry standard. Prior to 2001, the primary focus for call center monitoring had been on agent interactions rather than on the applications and infrastructure that play such a crucial role in improving agent productivity and maintaining the overall QoE for call center users.

With the rapid expansion of IVR/speech-driven self-service applications, along with the development of increasingly elaborate call routing and screen pop technologies to optimize agent interactions, this predominant focus on the human elements ignores the contact centers increasing reliance the performance of self-service, CTI and screen pop technology to achieve its productivity and customer service goals. After all, who hasn't dialed into a self-service application and been unable to complete the transaction or been asked by an agent to repeat the information already entered by voice or touch-pad?


Figure 1: Performance varies tremendously within and between companies. (Source: Empirix Benchmark Survey)

These costly flaws were highlighted by a benchmark study conducted last year of contact center performance of the utilities industry. Created and published by Empirix, Inc.—a testing and monitoring firm that provides products and services for both Web and voice systems—the study revealed that self-service performance varied tremendously from week to week and from company to company. (See Figure 1.) Of the high number of transaction failure rates, slow or unavailable databases accounted for some 20 percent of all transaction failures. In addition, the study showed that more than 37 percent of all transaction failures were due to switch problems. Poor quality or wrong prompts accounted for roughly 26 percent of failures. The remaining 15 percent of failures were caused by routing errors, in which calls were accepted by the ACD but were never connected to the voice application.

Empirix has cross-indexed results from this study (of the financial services, utility and wireless industries) against relevant customer satisfaction data from a Purdue University study. This combined dataset shows significant correlation between overall customer satisfaction and the reliability of contact center self-service applications—a strong indicator that high call failure rates damage a customer's overall level of satisfaction.


Figure 2: Customer satisfaction (and use) decline if IVR performs poorly. (Source: Empirix Benchmark Survey and Purdue University.)

 

The Pitfalls of Manual Monitoring
Prior to the advent of automated monitoring solutions, call centers made do with manual methods that required agents to dial in to an application. Some centers also used network management tools to monitor individual system components. Unfortunately, manual monitoring is subjective, expensive and rarely performed with adequate frequency or intensity. As a result it yields little in the way of detailed, consistent data about system performance. Network management tools also have major shortcomings: they miss a majority of potential performance problems because they report only on individual components, not on whether these components are interacting seamlessly to deliver a high QoE to the end user.

Manual monitoring or stand-alone component monitoring can miss glaring performance problems are painfully apparent to customers. At a contact center for a large wireless carrier, for example, agents would sometimes be flooded with self-service calls even when the IVR was still reporting as active and below capacity. The company implemented a performance monitoring solution and quickly discovered that, when customers called in, they were greeted, oddly enough by a sound clip of an opera singer rather than the expected opening prompt. A quick analysis also revealed that a load balancer was configured to think that each IVR only had a single T1 in each trunk group rather than the two T1s per group that were in fact available. The result was that, at only 50 percent capacity, the load balancer would think the IVR was full and route calls directly to agent queues, even though the components all appeared to be acting normally.

 

The Quick Fix
Discovering the causes, frequency and symptoms of call failures and other performance problems is only the first step in reducing costly slowdowns, downtime and congestion in contact center systems. Transmitting that information to the appropriate technical support person or system in real time is just as important. For this reason, automated monitoring solutions should include intelligent alerting capabilities that allow contact centers to quickly detect, diagnose and resolve issues. Speedier resolution not only improves customer QoE, but also saves on toll charges, agent costs and other contact center resources.

In addition to providing immediate access to performance data that helps contact center managers detect and respond to performance issues, well-designed automated monitoring solutions also offer archiving and analysis of historical performance data. Over time, this data can be used to set – and actively manage toward – specific service levels for each aspect of the contact center infrastructure. For example, individual service levels can be set to monitor carrier, IVR and database response times.

With all these advantages—true end-to-end monitoring, accurate benchmark performance data, real-time alerting, and significant boosts in the availability, reliability and quality of IVR/CTI systems—automated monitoring gives contact center managers an important new weapon in the war to control costs while enhancing customer satisfaction.

The increasing complexity of contact center voice systems (network, switch, IVR, CTI, middleware and databases) has generated a steadily growing potential for performance bottlenecks, outages, failures and errors. In turn, these performance problems lead to frustrated customers, unnecessary toll charges, overinvestment in capital equipment and bandwidth, inefficient use of agent and technical resources and increased agent turnover.

In an increasingly competitive business environment, with customers standing ready to abandon companies that deliver inferior quality of experience—and as a matter of sound fiscal practice—automated monitoring solutions are rapidly becoming standard elements in contact center design and management.


About the Author
Kurt Dahlstrand is an application management consultant at Empirix Inc., and has helped dozens of companies optimize their IVR and CTI performance through testing and monitoring techniques.

About the Company
Empirix is a source for test and monitoring solutions that measure, manage, and enhance the performance of Web and voice applications, contact centers and communications networks. Empirix delivers powerful and innovative products and services that improve end-users' Quality of Experience (QoE) while reducing development costs and improving time to market. Empirix currently delivers products, services and support to more than 3,400 customers worldwide, including Global 2000 enterprises, network equipment manufacturers and service providers

Today's Tip of the Day - Keep Cost In Perspective

Read today's tip or listen to it on podcast.

Published: Friday, August 1, 2003

Printer Friendly Version Printer friendly version

2024 Buyers Guide Speech Technology

 
1.) 
Premium Listing
Call Center Studio

Call Center Studio
Call Center Studio is the world’s first call center built on Google and is one of the most secure and stable systems with some of the industry’s best reporting. It is one of the most full-featured enterprise grade systems (with the most calling features, one of the best call distribution, outbound dialing features and integrations—including IVR, AI Speech Recognition, blended inbound/outbound calling and includes Google’s new Dialogflow and Speech API. Call Center Studio is the absolute easiest to use (with a 10 minute setup), and is the price performance leader with lower equipment cost and less setup time.


2.) 
Daisee

Daisee
Daisee builds technology that empowers people to solve problems by making interactions simple and smart so they can have a more significant impact, be more productive and be better at what they do. We believe incremental improvements carry huge potency and provide exponentially greater change for the better.

Genesys customers can now automate risk and quality management using Daisee’s speech and sentiment analytics and remediation workflow software. Daisee helps improve customer experience, ensure regulatory compliance, identify missed commercial opportunities & training requirements as well as provide valuable insights back to the business directly from the frontline – the true voice-of-...
(read more)

3.) 
Eckoh

EckohASSIST
Advanced speech recognition and natural language expertise that routes callers by simply asking ‘how can I help you?’. It allows customers to use their own words to ask for what they want and steers them to the right place.

Menus are eliminated altogether and contact centres can use a single inbound telephone number.
 

About us - in 60 seconds!

Industry Champion Award Leaderboard

Most active award entrants in the past 48 hours! - Vote for Others / About Program
Submit Event

Upcoming Events

The 19th AMERICAS Annual Best Practices Conferences are here! Meeting Point for the World's Best Contact Center & CX Companies Read More...
 31813 
Showing 1 - 1 of 3 items

Newsletter Registration

Please check to agree to be placed on the eNewsletter mailing list.
both ids empty
session userid =
session UserTempID =
session adminlevel =
session blnTempHelpChatShow =
CMS =
session cookie set = True
session page-view-total = 1
session page-view-total = 1
applicaiton blnAwardsClosed =
session blnCompletedAwardInterestPopup =
session blnCheckNewsletterInterestPopup =
session blnCompletedNewsletterInterestPopup =