Industry Research : Overall Satisfaction with Wireless Carrier Customer Care Increases
Wireless carrier customer satisfaction with self-service-enabled care channels—online and automated response system (ARS)—is higher than at any time, as a growing shift in demographics is impacting the service experience, according to the J.D. Power 2016 U.S. Wireless Customer Care Full-Service Performance StudySM—Volume 1 and the J.D. Power 2016 U.S. Wireless Customer Care Non-Contract Performance StudySM—Volume 1.
Now in their 14th year, the semiannual studies examine how well wireless carriers provide customer service via the following contact channels: phone (consisting of two sub-channels—automated response system [ARS], then customer service representative [CSR] and ARS only); walk-in (retail store); and online (website, online chat and social media). The studies measure satisfaction with each contact method and analyze processing issues, such as the efficiency of problem resolution and the duration of hold times. Satisfaction is calculated on a 1,000-point scale.
Wireless carrier customers have a variety of service channels to choose from when they experience an issue or have a question. Based on contact occurrences in the study, 49% of full-service customers have had a walk-in service contact in the previous three months, while 43% have had an ARS, then CSR contact; 42% have had an online contact; and 24% have had an ARS only contact. Volume over volume, satisfaction in the ARS only index has increased by 31 points and in the online index by 19 points. In contrast, when customers use a service channel where interaction with a representative is required, changes in satisfaction are relatively minor for walk-in (+10 points) and ARS, then CSR (-1 point).
"Given the number of dedicated contact channels available, the self-service-enabled channels such as online and ARS generate the largest increases in overall satisfaction, compared with the Full-Service Vol. 2 Study in 2015, just six months ago," said Kirk Parsons, senior director and technology, media & telecom practice leader at J.D. Power. "One of the main influences contributing to satisfaction gains in self-service-enabled channels is the growth in the percentage of Millennial customers, who have a relatively high propensity to use these channels."
Overall, 43% of customers using the online channel are Millennials vs. 40% in the previous volume, and an even larger increase is found in the ARS only channel (+5 percentage points to 49%). In contrast, the study shows a decline in the incidence of Boomers in both channels (-1 percentage point and -2 percentage points, respectively).
More importantly, satisfaction among Millennials is 78 points higher than among Boomers in the online channel (816 vs. 738, respectively) and 36 points higher in the ARS only channel (853 vs. 817).
According to Parsons, "As customer care usage patterns continue to change with Millennials, it's important for wireless providers to meet or exceed the service expectations of this growing and key demographic segment, which can lead to increased satisfaction and future loyalty."
Following are some of the key findings of the 2016 studies:
- Wireless Care Satisfaction Improves: Overall satisfaction among wireless full-service customers is 788—an improvement of 7 points from the 2015 Full-Service Study—Vol 2. Among non-contract wireless customers (738), a full 13-point gain has occurred from the 2015 Non-Contract Study—Vol 2.
- Millennials Heavy Users of Customer Service: Overall, Millennials are relatively heavy users of customer service. During the previous three months, 43% of Millennials have had a customer service contact, compared with just 24% of Boomers.
- Millennials' First-Contact Resolution: The first-contact resolution rate is lower among Millennials (54%) across all four care channels than among Boomers (62%).
- High Rate of Billing Issues for Millennials: In all care channels, Millennials have an elevated rate of billing-related problems or questions. For example, among customers who visit their carrier's store with a problem, 19% of Millennials cite "incorrect bill amount" as a reason for the visit, compared with just 8% of Boomers. Similarly, 16% of Millennials cite "charged for calls not made or services/products I do not have" as a reason for the visit, compared with just 2% of Boomers.
T-Mobile ranks highest among wireless full-service carriers, with an overall score of 802. T-Mobile performs particularly well in the ARS, then CSR channel and performs above the full-service average in three of the four service channels.
Virgin Mobile ranks highest among wireless non-contract carriers, scoring 770. Virgin Mobile performs above the non-contract average in three of the four service channels.
The 2016 U.S. Wireless Customer Care Full-Service Performance Study—Volume 1 is based on responses from 8,963 full-service wireless customers, and the 2016 U.S. Wireless Customer Care Non-Contract Performance Study—Volume 1 is based on responses from 2,870 non-contract wireless customers. The studies are based on the experiences of current customers who contacted their carrier's customer care department within the past three months. The studies were fielded from July through December 2015.
Posted by Veronica Silva Cusi, news correspondent
Today's Tip of the Day - Customer Feedback
More Editorial From J.D. Power
Published: Monday, February 1, 2016
Upstream Works provides best-in-class Omnichannel Contact Center software to increase customer engagement and agent success. We bring the omnichannel customer journey together across all applications ...
Altitude Software is a privately-owned, independent company, and a technology provider in contact center solutions, with its Unified Customer Interaction(uCI) product line. Founded in 1993, Altitude S...
Calabrio is revolutionizing the way enterprises engage their customers with Calabrio ONE, a unified workforce optimization (WFO) suite—including call recording, quality management, workforce managemen...
Fiserv is a provider of technology solutions to the financial world, including banks, credit unions, securities processing organizations, insurance companies.